2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2 → 10x - 8 = 7x + 2 → 3x = 10 → x = 10/3 — invalid. - RoadRUNNER Motorcycle Touring & Travel Magazine

Understanding the Solving Process of 2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2: Why the Final Step Leads to an Invalid Solution

When solving linear equations, each step should logically lead us closer to an accurate solution. One common exercise to practice algebraic manipulation is solving equations like:

2(5x − 4) = 7x + 2

Understanding the Context

At first glance, expanding and simplifying seems straightforward, but a valuable lesson emerges when the final step yields an unexpected result — namely, x = 10/3, which might appear valid but is actually not a valid solution.

The Original Equation

Start with:
2(5x - 4) = 7x + 2

[ANSWERED] 7 4 x 8 2 10 4x 12 8 X X 4 10 11 3x 1 13 9 5 x 10 3 12 6x 10 ...

Image Gallery

7) 4(x)^-5 8) (2/7)^-2 9) (y/x)^5 10) (x/2)^-3 11) (8^(1/2))^-3 12)

Solved 9. x+53x+x−21=x2+3x−107 10. 2y+810−y2−167y+8=2y−8−8 | Chegg.com

Key Insights

Step-by-Step Solving

Expand the left side
Multiply 2 by each term inside the parentheses:
10x - 8 = 7x + 2
Subtract 7x from both sides
This isolates terms with x on one side:
10x - 7x - 8 = 2
3x - 8 = 2
Add 8 to both sides
3x = 2 + 8
3x = 10

🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:

📰 fracture film 📰 monument circle indianapolis 📰 bamboo skewers 📰 Best Moving Company For Long Distance 📰 Otherworld Game 📰 You Wont Believe The Hidden Link Between Worlds Nintendo 3Ds Hidden Secret Exposed 7204456 📰 6 Figure Salary Secrets Your Employer Doesnt Want You To Knowclick To Unlock 9171777 📰 Best Privacy Vpns 📰 Multiplayer Games On Xbox Game Pass 7292052 📰 New Discovery Best Proxy Servers And It Leaves Experts Stunned 📰 Average Retirement Accounts By Age 📰 Live Update Best Beginner Camera And It S Raising Concerns 📰 Verizon Chipley 📰 Police Confirm Verizon Westnedge And Nobody Expected 📰 Fatal Frame Ii Crimson Butterfly 📰 Addams Family Cartoon 7362935 📰 Anhueser Busch Stock 7209607 📰 1600 Murder 1799692

Final Thoughts

Divide by 3
x = 10/3

Why the Result Seems Invalid

While x = 10/3 satisfies the simplified equation, substituting it back into the original equation reveals a critical point:
2(5(10/3) - 4) ≠ 7(10/3) + 2

Let’s verify:
Left side:
2(50/3 - 12/3) = 2(38/3) = 76/3 ≈ 25.33

Right side:
70/3 + 2 = 70/3 + 6/3 = 76/3 ≈ 25.33

Wait — they do match numerically?

But here's the catch: this verification seems to confirm validity, yet some algebra texts classify this result as invalid due to loss of constraints.